spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer



CPA LOGO
spacer
Latest News
Hot Issues
ATO reveals small business hit list to combat tax debt
What are the FBT implications of Employee Christmas Parties and Gifts?
Assess a business before you buy it
Christmas Parties and Taxi Fare/Rideshare – FBT implications.
Practitioners cautioned on ATO’s top target areas for GST
ATO to target growing businesses in latest compliance blitz
Our SG compliance results are here
Top 20 Most Watched Christmas Movies ever - pre covid
A Unique Advent Calendar
Businesses ghosting the ATO targeted in debt collection blitz
Claiming the tax-free threshold: getting it right
Aussies tired of ‘dodgy tax criminals’, warns ATO
Protect your small business by following these essential steps.
Super guarantee a focus area for ATO business debt collection
Controversial ‘Airbnb tax’ set to become law
Withholding for foreign residents: an ATO focus area
1 in 3 crypto owners confused about tax, study reveals
20 Years of Silicon Valley Trends: 2004 - 2024 Insights
ATO reveals common rental property errors from data-matching program
New SMSF expense rules: what you need to know
Government releases details on luxury car tax changes
Treasurer unveils design details for payday super
6 steps to create a mentally healthy and vibrant workplace
What are the government’s intentions with negative gearing?
Small business decries ‘unfair’ payday super changes
The Leaders Who Refused to Step Down 1939 - 2024
Time for a superannuation check-up?
Scam alert: fake ASIC branding on social media
Millions of landlords the target of expanded ATO crackdown
Government urged to exempt small firms from TPB reforms
ATO warns businesses on looming TPAR deadline
How to read a Balance Sheet
Articles archive
Quarter 3 July - September 2024
Quarter 2 April - June 2024
Quarter 1 January - March 2024
Quarter 4 October - December 2023
Quarter 3 July - September 2023
Quarter 2 April - June 2023
Quarter 1 January - March 2023
Quarter 4 October - December 2022
Quarter 3 July - September 2022
Quarter 2 April - June 2022
Quarter 1 January - March 2022
Quarter 4 October - December 2021
Quarter 3 July - September 2021
Quarter 2 April - June 2021
Quarter 1 January - March 2021
Quarter 4 October - December 2020
Quarter 3 July - September 2020
Quarter 2 April - June 2020
Quarter 1 January - March 2020
Quarter 4 October - December 2019
Quarter 3 July - September 2019
Quarter 2 April - June 2019
Quarter 1 January - March 2019
Quarter 4 October - December 2018
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
What are the government’s intentions with negative gearing?

Both the Treasurer and the Prime Minister have confirmed that Treasury is exploring changes to the contentious policy.



.


In a move reminiscent of 2019, both Jim Chalmers and Anthony Albanese confirmed on Wednesday that Treasury officials are working on options to scale back negative gearing and capital gains tax, with the Treasurer insisting the review is “not unusual”.


“Treasury looks at all kinds of Treasury options all of the time. It is not unusual for the public service and, in my case, my department … to examine issues that are being speculated about in the public or in the Parliament. That is how a good public service operates,” Chalmers said.


He stressed that, while the review isn’t part of the government's current housing agenda, he wouldn’t dismiss the possibility of it being included down the line.


Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, however, downplayed reports that the government commissioned Treasury modelling on changes to negative gearing and capital gains tax, stating he values Treasury’s advice and supports it exploring a range of policy ideas.


But while he scoffed at a question about negative gearing in an ABC interview just last week, speaking to the ABC Radio on Wednesday, the PM said: “The department, like all departments, looks at various things at various times."


"That's what Treasury do. We respect the public service. Lots of people look at lots of things, but it's certainly not our policy," the PM added.


Although he denied being the one who requested Treasury to explore potential changes, he stated that he is unaware if Treasurer Chalmers did so.


"I don't know because I'm not the Treasurer. And the Treasurer is on his way to China as we speak," the PM said.


"What we have done is to concentrate on our Homes for Australia plan. What I can say is, at no level of the government has there been a debate about anything other than getting our Homes for Australia plan through. And those meetings include, obviously, in our Cabinet, and those processes include, obviously, the Treasurer and other Ministers as well. What we're concentrating on is delivering the Homes for Australia plan, some of which is caught up in the Senate, because we know that the key to housing policy is lifting supply, and that has been our concentration."


Meanwhile shadow treasurer, Angus Taylor, is convinced Labor is "hard at it", confirming on Wednesday that there are no circumstances under which the Coalition would support any reforms to negative gearing.


“We don’t support a tax on housing that will reduce the supply of housing and increase the cost of housing. In a cost-of-living crisis, the idea that a tax on housing is the way to solve a cost-of-living crisis where the biggest pain being felt by most Australian households is the cost of housing, is just extraordinary. Only this Treasurer and this Prime Minister could think that is the answer to this problem,” Taylor said.


The debate over negative gearing seems to resurface every three years in the run-up to elections, with many attributing Bill Shorten’s loss in the 2019 federal election to the policy’s unpopularity.


In February, Treasurer Jim Chalmers firmly stated that the government was not considering any changes to negative gearing. Fast forward to September, and it seems the government is now open to the possibility of adjustments, possibly spurred by mounting pressure from the Greens to tackle housing affordability.


Namely, two key elements of the government’s housing policy – a tax incentive for private developers to build rent-capped apartments and a subsidy scheme for first home buyers – are stalled in the Senate due to a lack of support from both the Greens and the Coalition, with the Greens demanding changes to negative gearing and capital gains tax in exchange for their backing.


Speaking to Sky News back in February, amid similar pressure from the Greens, Chalmers said regarding potential changes to negative gearing: “That’s not something that we’re proposing, not something that we are considering, not something that we are working up.”


At the same time, Taylor told ABC’s Insiders that the opposition is aware the government is contemplating changes to the policy.


AMP’s chief economist, Shane Oliver, previously argued that any changes to negative gearing could create distortions in the market, potentially exacerbating property affordability issues by reducing the supply of rental properties.


Capital gains, on the other hand, Oliver admitted, is potentially excessive and could use a revision.


“There is a case to consider removing the capital gains tax discount and return to the pre-1999 approach of adjusting capital gains for price inflation,” he said earlier this year.


Back in 2019, Labor proposed to halve the 50 per cent capital gains tax deduction and limit negative gearing to new properties only.


 


 


 


 


Maja Garaca Djurdjevic
September 26 2024
smsfadviser.com




15th-October-2024
spacer
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer